Environmentalists are urging Toronto to join 13 other Ontario city councils that want the province to stop using natural gas for electricity generation. There’s an old saying that in a democracy, the people deserve to get what they vote for, good and hard. It’s tempting to ask Ontario’s electricity system operator to give these cities what they want by no longer supplying any power generated by natural gas plants. But I’m sure the power system staff are too kind-hearted to do that. Because it would create a lot of problems.
For example, anyone with surgery scheduled on a hot summer day would face the risk of “brownouts” during the procedure. City residents would lose their air conditioning and space heating just when they need them most. And all those wind turbines would need to be dismantled (though that might be considered a plus by most locals).
We use natural gas in Ontario because it is variable on short notice. Power consumption rises through the day and drops overnight. That cycle overlays on the seasonal patterns, with summertime demand surges for cooling, wintertime surges for heating, and predictable demand reductions on mild days in the shoulder seasons.
If you draw a chart of the seasonal and daily cycles you will see a minimum level of demand the system must always be able to satisfy, and then within each season and each 24-hour span there are temporary peaks also needing to be handled. And within those cycles there are further variations that can change minute-by-minute.
Ontario’s electricity system, like every other jurisdiction’s, therefore needs two kinds of power—baseload and peaking. Baseload involves running power generation facilities at a constant output level, which is the most economical way for them to operate. And for some facilities, especially nuclear plants and hydroelectric dams, it may be the only way they can run. Peaking facilities can ramp their output up and down minute-by-minute.
In Ontario, natural gas is the most flexible type of power in this regard. Hydro dams can spill or withhold water to vary production, but are constrained in this behaviour by conservation authorities, and they can’t guarantee increased production if the water flow isn’t available. Nor can we count on importing electricity whenever we need it if adjacent jurisdictions also face high demand. The Ontario nuclear fleet has some ability to adjust its output, though reactors require a few days’ notice. For speed and reliability of scaling throughout the day, having a margin of natural gas power is essential.
If that flexibility is missing, a heatwave or cold snap can mean a sudden shortage of power. So can a sudden increase in power demand somewhere else on the grid. Likewise, a sudden unexpected drop in demand can cause instability in the system if the supply cannot also quickly be scaled back.
Now, to make the situation even more complex, add a fleet of wind turbines into the mix. The wind varies from hour to hour and can gust or vanish without warning. No electricity system can accommodate such intermittent variations in production without another part of the generator fleet being able, on a moment’s notice, to compensate by varying in the opposite direction. In Ontario, that’s gas once again. Power systems that add a lot of wind energy must therefore add a lot of natural gas capacity as a reserve supply.
Finally, the environmental benefits from eliminating gas would be minimal. Ontario already eliminated 85 per cent of electricity-related greenhouse gases between 1991 and 2018 by phasing-out coal—at a very high cost. As for ordinary pollutants, our air quality is very good now. In a typical year, our particulate levels never exceed even the most stringent standards. And while we occasionally exceed ozone standards, analysis by Ontario’s Ministry of the Environment shows it’s due to U.S.-based sources, not domestic ones.
If we phaseout gas, we risk creating intolerable costs and problems for all electricity users in exchange for imperceptibly small environmental gains. City councils can get rid of gas as soon as they figure out how to phaseout summer heat, winter cold, daytime, nighttime and the vagaries of wind.
Commentary
Natural gas plays vital role in fuelling Ontario
EST. READ TIME 4 MIN.Share this:
Facebook
Twitter / X
Linkedin
Environmentalists are urging Toronto to join 13 other Ontario city councils that want the province to stop using natural gas for electricity generation. There’s an old saying that in a democracy, the people deserve to get what they vote for, good and hard. It’s tempting to ask Ontario’s electricity system operator to give these cities what they want by no longer supplying any power generated by natural gas plants. But I’m sure the power system staff are too kind-hearted to do that. Because it would create a lot of problems.
For example, anyone with surgery scheduled on a hot summer day would face the risk of “brownouts” during the procedure. City residents would lose their air conditioning and space heating just when they need them most. And all those wind turbines would need to be dismantled (though that might be considered a plus by most locals).
We use natural gas in Ontario because it is variable on short notice. Power consumption rises through the day and drops overnight. That cycle overlays on the seasonal patterns, with summertime demand surges for cooling, wintertime surges for heating, and predictable demand reductions on mild days in the shoulder seasons.
If you draw a chart of the seasonal and daily cycles you will see a minimum level of demand the system must always be able to satisfy, and then within each season and each 24-hour span there are temporary peaks also needing to be handled. And within those cycles there are further variations that can change minute-by-minute.
Ontario’s electricity system, like every other jurisdiction’s, therefore needs two kinds of power—baseload and peaking. Baseload involves running power generation facilities at a constant output level, which is the most economical way for them to operate. And for some facilities, especially nuclear plants and hydroelectric dams, it may be the only way they can run. Peaking facilities can ramp their output up and down minute-by-minute.
In Ontario, natural gas is the most flexible type of power in this regard. Hydro dams can spill or withhold water to vary production, but are constrained in this behaviour by conservation authorities, and they can’t guarantee increased production if the water flow isn’t available. Nor can we count on importing electricity whenever we need it if adjacent jurisdictions also face high demand. The Ontario nuclear fleet has some ability to adjust its output, though reactors require a few days’ notice. For speed and reliability of scaling throughout the day, having a margin of natural gas power is essential.
If that flexibility is missing, a heatwave or cold snap can mean a sudden shortage of power. So can a sudden increase in power demand somewhere else on the grid. Likewise, a sudden unexpected drop in demand can cause instability in the system if the supply cannot also quickly be scaled back.
Now, to make the situation even more complex, add a fleet of wind turbines into the mix. The wind varies from hour to hour and can gust or vanish without warning. No electricity system can accommodate such intermittent variations in production without another part of the generator fleet being able, on a moment’s notice, to compensate by varying in the opposite direction. In Ontario, that’s gas once again. Power systems that add a lot of wind energy must therefore add a lot of natural gas capacity as a reserve supply.
Finally, the environmental benefits from eliminating gas would be minimal. Ontario already eliminated 85 per cent of electricity-related greenhouse gases between 1991 and 2018 by phasing-out coal—at a very high cost. As for ordinary pollutants, our air quality is very good now. In a typical year, our particulate levels never exceed even the most stringent standards. And while we occasionally exceed ozone standards, analysis by Ontario’s Ministry of the Environment shows it’s due to U.S.-based sources, not domestic ones.
If we phaseout gas, we risk creating intolerable costs and problems for all electricity users in exchange for imperceptibly small environmental gains. City councils can get rid of gas as soon as they figure out how to phaseout summer heat, winter cold, daytime, nighttime and the vagaries of wind.
Share this:
Facebook
Twitter / X
Linkedin
Ross McKitrick
Professor of Economics, University of Guelph
STAY UP TO DATE
More on this topic
Related Articles
By: Kenneth P. Green
By: Kenneth P. Green
By: Julio Mejía and Elmira Aliakbari
By: Ben Eisen and Jake Fuss
STAY UP TO DATE