The Notley government introduced its long awaited first budget today, and in line with expectations, the budget forecasts a $6.1 billion deficit for this fiscal year. The budget also forecasts deficits in the next three years, which will total $11.9 billion. In nominal terms, this year’s is the largest budget deficit in the history of the province. While the size of the deficit will get much attention, we should also be concerned that Alberta is on track to record 10 budget deficits in 11 years (see below table). This isn’t a one-time blip; budget deficits seem to be the new normal in Alberta.
Alberta’s Deficit/Surplus (in millions), 2008/09 to 2019/20
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/16*
2016/17*
2017/18*
2018/19*
(931)
(476)
(2,262)
(114)
(3,099)
(302)
1,115
(6,118)
(5,417)
(4,366)
(2,100)
Persistent deficits over the past eight years have led to a significant decline in Alberta’s net financial assets. Today’s budget revealed that the province will return to a net debt position next year, where the total value of government debt exceeds financial assets.
The chart below shows a steep decline in the province’s net assets since 2008/09, when Alberta first began to run deficits. The province’s net asset position has declined from a high of $35 billion in 2007/08 to a forecasted $3.3 billion in this fiscal year (2015/16). By 2016/17, Alberta will be in a net debt position for the first time in more than 15 years. In 2017/18, the province will have a net debt of $13.7 billion. That is a $48.7 billion swing in the province’s financial position in 10 years.
The government must address chronic deficits sooner rather than later so it can re-focus on tax competitiveness and saving for the future. While Finance Minister Joe Ceci (pictured at top of page) blames oil prices for Alberta’s deficit, in reality the province has run surpluses when oil prices were much lower than today (adjusted for inflation), and failed to balance the budget in years when oil was over $90 per barrel.
The real culprit for the deficit is a rapid increase in government spending over the past decade. In other words, successive governments have been unable to control spending when times were good and therefore have been ill prepared for the bad times. Failure to address the roots of Alberta’s chronic deficits will prolong Alberta’s path back to a balanced budget.
Commentary
Are deficits the new normal in Alberta?
EST. READ TIME 2 MIN.Share this:
Facebook
Twitter / X
Linkedin
The Notley government introduced its long awaited first budget today, and in line with expectations, the budget forecasts a $6.1 billion deficit for this fiscal year. The budget also forecasts deficits in the next three years, which will total $11.9 billion. In nominal terms, this year’s is the largest budget deficit in the history of the province. While the size of the deficit will get much attention, we should also be concerned that Alberta is on track to record 10 budget deficits in 11 years (see below table). This isn’t a one-time blip; budget deficits seem to be the new normal in Alberta.
Alberta’s Deficit/Surplus (in millions), 2008/09 to 2019/20
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/16*
2016/17*
2017/18*
2018/19*
(931)
(476)
(2,262)
(114)
(3,099)
(302)
1,115
(6,118)
(5,417)
(4,366)
(2,100)
Persistent deficits over the past eight years have led to a significant decline in Alberta’s net financial assets. Today’s budget revealed that the province will return to a net debt position next year, where the total value of government debt exceeds financial assets.
The chart below shows a steep decline in the province’s net assets since 2008/09, when Alberta first began to run deficits. The province’s net asset position has declined from a high of $35 billion in 2007/08 to a forecasted $3.3 billion in this fiscal year (2015/16). By 2016/17, Alberta will be in a net debt position for the first time in more than 15 years. In 2017/18, the province will have a net debt of $13.7 billion. That is a $48.7 billion swing in the province’s financial position in 10 years.
The government must address chronic deficits sooner rather than later so it can re-focus on tax competitiveness and saving for the future. While Finance Minister Joe Ceci (pictured at top of page) blames oil prices for Alberta’s deficit, in reality the province has run surpluses when oil prices were much lower than today (adjusted for inflation), and failed to balance the budget in years when oil was over $90 per barrel.
The real culprit for the deficit is a rapid increase in government spending over the past decade. In other words, successive governments have been unable to control spending when times were good and therefore have been ill prepared for the bad times. Failure to address the roots of Alberta’s chronic deficits will prolong Alberta’s path back to a balanced budget.
Share this:
Facebook
Twitter / X
Linkedin
Steve Lafleur
Charles Lammam
STAY UP TO DATE
More on this topic
Related Articles
By: Tegan Hill
By: Jake Fuss and Grady Munro
By: Jake Fuss and Grady Munro
By: Fred McMahon
STAY UP TO DATE