Printer-friendly version

Since 2004, the Fraser Institute has annually published a measurement of the financial sustainability of public health insurance in Canada called Paying More, Getting Less.

Printer-friendly version

One reason that governments impose taxes is to finance the services that citizens demand. This study examines how governments can extract tax revenues in the least costly and economically damaging manner. There are, of course, other policy considerations in determining tax policy. Indeed equity (often referred to as fairness) and simplicity are critical policy factors. That acknowledged, this study focuses on economic efficiency, which is frequently ignored in public policy discussions about tax policy.

Printer-friendly version

The Fraser Institute's annual Generosity Index measures this private monetary generosity using readily available data about the size and extent of charitable donations, as recorded on personal income tax returns in Canada and the United States. The 2006 index reveals a persistent generosity gap between these two countries.

Printer-friendly version

This 2006 edition of How Good is Canadian Health Care? provides answers to a series of questions that are important to resolve if Canada is to make the correct choices as it amends its health care policies. In this study, we primarily compare Canada to other countries that also have universal access, publicly funded, health care systems.

Printer-friendly version

This paper describes the evolution of Canadian air quality since the early 1970s and discusses the scientific question of whether current air pollution levels are a threat to human health. It then describes the existing structure of Canadian air-pollution policy, including the new focus on ultrafine particles and the introduction of Air Quality Indexes. It concludes by outlining some general principles that should guide policy-makers for developing future air-pollution legislation.

Printer-friendly version

Economic freedom measures the extent to which individuals, families, businesses, and other organizations are free to make economic decisions without of government interference.

Printer-friendly version

The inclusion of a commitment to equalization in the Constitution Act, 1982 has led politicians, lawyers, economists, and citizens alike to assume that a federal program transferring money from all Canadian citizens to the governments of some have not provinces is a constitutional imperative. This assumption has been used to justify the redistributive system and to oppose any changes.